The IMF stated that Colombia’s productivity has stagnated over the past 30 years

Productivity decreased by over 10% in the 1990s in Colombia and has remained at that low level.


Following the study presented by the International Monetary Fund, President Gustavo Petro asserted that his government inherited a country burdened with hidden billion-dollar debts.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) presented a report warning that Colombia’s economic growth is hindered by low productivity, which has stagnated over the past three decades. The report also provided a series of recommendations related to exports and the fiscal framework.

Among the main points, it stated that the country should begin to diversify its export basket to ensure future sustainability and should not neglect the fiscal framework in order to improve the current account.

Regarding productivity, the study suggests that Colombia is wasting resources, especially in sectors such as agriculture, construction, and services. It recommends addressing this issue through policies that promote productivity and growth.

On exports, the IMF noted progress in diversifying Colombia’s export basket between the 1960s and 1990s but sees stagnation since the early 21st century, along with a negative balance since the 2008 global financial crisis.

The report states that for Colombia to achieve fiscal consolidation, it must focus on better tax control and investment, as well as state spending, something that has already worked in other Latin American countries.

The IMF asserted that Colombia’s productivity has stagnated over the past decades, impacting various development aspects in the country, especially economic growth.

“Productivity decreased by over 10% in the 1990s in Colombia and has remained at that low level until 2019. Recent estimates suggest that TFP has not grown since 2019, as productivity growth in the years following the pandemic was barely sufficient to compensate for losses during the health crisis.”

The study identifies four factors affecting total factor productivity (TFP), although it notes that this varies depending on the sector. Technology is one of these factors; the report indicates reluctance at the enterprise level to adopt these systems, particularly in mining.

Another factor is that in manufacturing industries and agriculture, there are barriers to market participation, and those that become highly competitive fail to reach the ideal percentage, leading to a slowdown in productivity.

Finally, there is a dilemma with the entry and exit of companies, as highly productive companies are not entering the market.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR See More
Gabriel Micillo
Gabriel is a certified public accountant graduated from UNNE (National University of the Northeast, Argentina) and a software developer, currently pursuing a Master's degree in Finance and Economics. With nearly 8 years of experience working for accounting firms and brokerage firms. Concurrently, he has produced economic and financial reports on the current state of regional economies for the clients of the establishments where he has worked. Additionally, he assisted colleagues like Ignacio Teson in the drafting and editing of articles on similar topics in English language.

Related Articles

Comments

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

HFM

Doo Prime

XM

Best Forex Brokers