Quick overview

---

Bitcoin sparked a new debate after former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called the cryptocurrency market a “giant Ponzi scheme” in a recent column. In response to the remarks, Eric Trump and Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy, refuted the description.

Johnson argued that Bitcoin primarily depends on the number of new investors entering the market. He asserted that cryptocurrency prices appear to function similarly to Ponzi schemes because they rely on a steady flow of new users.

He shared his long-held conviction that cryptocurrencies operate in this manner and warned that the sector depends on attracting new, often inexperienced investors. To illustrate his concerns, he told a tale about a villager.

Johnson says the person invested approximately £500, or about $661, in Bitcoin after meeting someone in a pub who promised the investment would double. According to Johnson, the investor subsequently lost money.

He maintained that these circumstances highlight the dangers that older investors, in particular, who might not fully comprehend how cryptocurrency markets function, face. Johnson also questioned the intrinsic value of Bitcoin, pointing out that it only exists as computer-stored digital code.

On the other hand, he stated that governments and organizations that back traditional currencies have historically given them credibility.

Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy and supporter of Bitcoin, responded to Johnson’s criticism.

Saylor claimed that Bitcoin does not fit the framework of a Ponzi scheme because the network lacks an issuer, promoter, or guaranteed return. He defined cryptocurrency as a decentralized, open financial system that is driven by market demand and code. In response to Johnson’s remarks, Eric Trump expressed disagreement with the assertion that Bitcoin is similar to a Ponzi scheme.