ORCL Oracle Stock Faces Support As AI Cost Draws Bondholder Lawsuit
Due to increased scrutiny of its strategy caused on by legal challenges, mounting concerns about leverage, and rising costs for AI...
Quick overview
- Oracle's stock has faced renewed pressure due to legal challenges, rising leverage concerns, and high AI infrastructure costs.
- The company's upcoming dividend offers some stability, but its conservative payout ratio and low yield raise concerns among investors.
- Recent institutional activity reflects caution, with some firms reducing their Oracle positions amid ongoing risks.
- A bondholder lawsuit has intensified scrutiny of Oracle's balance sheet, highlighting the need for transparency and financial discipline.
Live ORCL Chart
[[ORCL-graph]]
Oracle’s early-2026 recovery has stalled due to new scrutiny of its approach brought on by legal challenges, growing leverage worries, and escalating AI infrastructure expenses.
A Fragile Calm After a Violent Reset
After one of the most dramatic valuation resets seen in large-cap technology over the past year, Oracle shares briefly attempted to stabilise. That pause, however, is proving fragile. The stock has once again come under pressure as investors refocus on unresolved issues around leverage, litigation, and the soaring cost of building AI infrastructure—concerns that have weighed heavily on AI-linked stocks in recent months.
What initially appeared to be a healthy consolidation following heavy selling has instead evolved into renewed weakness. Each attempt at recovery has struggled to gain traction, reinforcing the sense that confidence has not yet returned.
Dividend Offers Stability, But Not a Shield
Oracle will pay its next quarterly dividend on January 23, providing a modest anchor for income-focused investors. Shareholders holding 100 ORCL shares will receive $50 this quarter, implying $200 annually if payouts remain unchanged.
The dividend was held steady compared to the October 2025 distribution, signalling management’s commitment to consistency. On a full-year basis, the payout will still mark a slight improvement versus last year, when Oracle paid a lower $0.40 dividend in the first quarter of 2025.
That said, Oracle’s dividend profile remains conservative. The forward payout ratio sits at 18.72%, with a 1.05% yield, below the sector average of 1.37%. While sustainable, the dividend alone is unlikely to offset broader concerns around valuation, balance-sheet risk, and execution.
Institutional Activity Reflects Measured Caution
Recent portfolio adjustments underline a cautious institutional stance. Courier Capital LLC trimmed its Oracle position by 8.6% in the third quarter, selling 5,731 shares. The firm now holds 61,002 shares, valued at approximately $17.16 million, with Oracle representing 1.0% of total assets and ranking as its 23rd-largest holding.
While not a wholesale exit, the reduction reflects risk management rather than renewed conviction, echoing a broader pattern among asset managers.
A Rebound That Quickly Lost Momentum
Oracle entered last week attempting to build on tentative gains following weeks of selling. For a brief moment, the stock appeared to be forming a base. That optimism evaporated midweek when shares failed to break above technical resistance and reversed sharply.
The inability to sustain upside reinforced the perception that recent buying lacked depth. Rather than signalling a durable bottom, the move increasingly looks like a pause within a broader corrective phase.
Bondholder Lawsuit Reignites Core Fears
The immediate trigger for the latest selloff was a bondholder lawsuit filed in New York state court. The proposed class action, led by the Ohio Carpenters’ Pension Plan, accuses Oracle of misleading investors over the funding implications of its aggressive AI expansion.
At the centre of the dispute is Oracle’s issuance of roughly $18 billion in bonds on September 25, just two weeks after unveiling a $300 billion, five-year agreement to supply computing capacity to OpenAI. Bondholders allege that Oracle failed to adequately disclose the scale of additional borrowing required to support the deal.
For equity investors, the lawsuit strikes at a particularly sensitive area: transparency. Legal challenges tied to disclosure not only threaten reputational damage but also risk higher funding costs precisely when Oracle may need continued access to capital markets.
How Much Debt Is Too Much?
The lawsuit has intensified scrutiny of Oracle’s balance sheet at a time when leverage is becoming central to the AI investment debate. Analysts at BNP Paribas recently suggested Oracle may require an additional $25–30 billion in funding to advance its AI ambitions—well below earlier estimates near $100 billion, but still significant.
Morgan Stanley has previously warned that total incremental borrowing could reach $70 billion by 2026, depending on the pace of expansion. In a high-rate environment, the cost of servicing that debt looms large and is no longer being brushed aside by markets.
Technical Picture Signals Persistent Fragility
From a technical standpoint, Oracle’s charts reflect deteriorating sentiment. On the monthly timeframe, the stock is hovering near the 20-period moving average, but there is little evidence of strong buying interest at that level.
ORCL Chart Monthly – Can the 20 SMA Hold for Long?
On the daily chart, Oracle briefly bounced from the 200-day moving average, only to be rejected by the 50-day average, which is now acting as resistance. The pattern of lower highs remains intact, reinforcing bearish momentum..
ORCL Chart Daily – The Highs Keep Getting Lower
A sustained break below current support would shift focus toward the $150 area, with downside risk extending toward the April lows near $118 if selling pressure intensifies.
A Compressed Look at Broader Risks (Shortened Section)
Oracle’s challenges extend beyond its own stock. Rising concern about the sustainability of AI infrastructure spending has spread across technology markets, weighing on sentiment toward capital-intensive growth stories.
Governance changes have added to unease, with two long-standing board members stepping down after nearly two decades of service. Although the company emphasised continuity, the timing has unsettled investors given the scale of Oracle’s strategic commitments.
Speculation around Oracle’s potential involvement in a TikTok U.S. consortium provided brief relief, but markets have treated the story cautiously due to regulatory uncertainty.
Meanwhile, Oracle’s massive $523 billion performance obligation backlog offers long-term revenue visibility but also underscores the scale of investment required to deliver on those contracts.
Cash Flow Now Dominates the Narrative
Operationally, Oracle continues to post solid revenue growth. Quarterly revenue rose 14% year-on-year to $16.05 billion, while cloud services and applications revenue surged 34%.
However, free cash flow has deteriorated sharply, sinking deeper into negative territory beyond $13 billion. For investors, this has become the defining issue. Growth without cash generation is no longer enough to sustain premium valuations.
Conclusion: Ambition Meets Market Discipline
Oracle’s transition from AI favourite to market sceptic has been swift and unforgiving. While the company retains scale, backlog, and strategic relevance, investors are demanding clearer evidence of financial discipline, funding transparency, and sustainable returns.
Until those concerns are addressed, rallies are likely to remain tentative—and Oracle’s stock will stay vulnerable in a market that is increasingly intolerant of unchecked ambition.
- Check out our free forex signals
- Follow the top economic events on FX Leaders economic calendar
- Trade better, discover more Forex Trading Strategies
- Open a FREE Trading Account
Save