CRML Stock 30% Fall Unravels Strong Start to 2026, Amid Policy Shifts and Sector Rivalry

Critical Metals Corp.’s sharp early-2026 rally has been swiftly tested, as encouraging drill results collided with intensifying geopolitical

From Breakout to Breakdown: Critical Metals Faces Volatility as Rare Earth Geopolitics Shift

Quick overview

  • Critical Metals Corp. experienced a volatile start to 2026, with its stock price dropping over 30% after an initial rally fueled by positive drill results.
  • Encouraging assay data from the Tanbreez project in Greenland highlighted the presence of critical rare earth metals, reinforcing the project's significance amid geopolitical shifts.
  • Partnerships in Saudi Arabia aim to enhance CRML's strategic positioning by developing downstream processing capabilities, although execution risks remain.
  • A sudden U.S. government investment in a rival firm underscored the competitive landscape, revealing that not all rare earth developers will benefit equally from policy support.

Critical Metals Corp.’s sharp early-2026 rally has been swiftly tested, as encouraging drill results collided with intensifying geopolitical competition and shifting policy priorities in the rare earths sector.

A Volatile Start to 2026 After a Difficult 2025

Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRML) entered 2026 with renewed momentum following a turbulent prior year, but the optimism proved fragile. After peaking above $30 in October 2025, the stock endured a deep correction that wiped out much of its earlier gains. The start of the new year, however, appeared to mark a turning point, with CRML rebounding sharply on improving sentiment around rare earth supply chains and project-level progress.

That rebound culminated in a rapid surge toward $22 early in January, briefly placing the stock back among the sector’s strongest performers. Yet the move has since reversed aggressively, with shares now trading below $15 and down more than 30% on the week—highlighting the market’s sensitivity to policy-driven capital allocation in strategic metals.

Greenland Drill Results Rekindle Fundamental Optimism

The initial catalyst for CRML’s early-2026 re-rating was the release of fresh assay data from the company’s 2025 drilling campaign at the Tanbreez rare earth project in Greenland. Results from both the Fjord Deposit and the Upper Fjord areas confirmed consistent grades and the presence of strategically significant rare earth and specialty metals.

Reported intersections included gallium, hafnium, cerium, and yttrium—materials viewed as increasingly critical to advanced manufacturing, defense applications, and clean-energy technologies. Management emphasized that the results added incremental mineralized tonnage beyond the existing Hill and Lower Fjord Deposits, reinforcing the project’s scale and geological continuity.

CEO Tony Sage framed the data as another validation step for Tanbreez as a globally relevant asset, particularly as Western governments prioritize diversification away from Chinese-controlled supply chains.

Saudi Arabia Partnerships Broaden the Strategic Narrative

Beyond Greenland, Critical Metals has sought to strengthen its longer-term positioning through partnerships under development in Saudi Arabia. These initiatives aim to establish downstream rare earth processing capacity—addressing one of the industry’s most persistent bottlenecks.

Moving beyond exploration toward processing and offtake could materially improve CRML’s strategic relevance, potentially enhancing margins and reducing reliance on established processing hubs. While execution risks remain significant, the market initially viewed these partnerships as a sign that the company is positioning itself for a more integrated role within the global rare earth ecosystem.

Regulatory Developments Improve the Sector Backdrop

Broader policy shifts also contributed to renewed interest in strategic metals. In the United States, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s final rule—effective January 21, 2026—modernized permitting under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act.

The revised framework allows for consolidated applications covering both exploration and commercial recovery, while integrating environmental and technical data across project stages. Although incremental, the changes signal a more pragmatic regulatory stance, potentially shortening timelines and lowering administrative friction for companies operating in critical minerals.

This evolving policy environment initially provided a modest tailwind for CRML and its peers.

A Sudden Reversal as Government Capital Picks a Rival

The narrative shifted abruptly when the U.S. government announced a $1.6 billion strategic investment in USA Rare Earth Inc. as part of efforts to expand domestic production and reduce reliance on China. Upon completion, the transaction would grant the government a substantial equity and warrant position in the rival firm.

Markets reacted swiftly. CRML fell 11% on Monday and extended losses through the week, sliding more than 30% as investors reassessed competitive positioning. The move underscored a hard reality for the sector: policy support may be selective rather than broad-based, and not all rare earth developers will benefit equally from geopolitical tailwinds.

Technical Momentum Breaks Down

From a technical perspective, the reversal has been decisive. CRML had established a base near $6.80 late in 2025, supported by converging moving averages and waning selling pressure. A steady four-week rally followed, but that momentum has now clearly stalled.

CRML Chart Weekly – Testing the 20 SMA

With shares trading below $15, the stock is testing its 20-week simple moving average. A sustained break below this level would expose downside risk toward the November 2025 lows near $6.80. The $20 level, which briefly acted as a breakout zone, has now reverted to resistance, while the October high near $32 remains a distant hurdle.

Geopolitics Remain Supportive—but Highly Uneven

At a macro level, rare earth geopolitics remain supportive. Ongoing U.S.–China tensions, export controls, and renewed focus on allied supply chains continue to highlight the strategic value of non-Chinese assets like Tanbreez. However, CRML’s recent sell-off illustrates that geopolitical alignment alone does not guarantee capital inflows.

As governments prioritize speed, scale, and certainty of supply, competition for strategic funding is intensifying—raising the bar for execution, partnerships, and political alignment.

Conclusion: Critical Metals’ early-2026 surge reflected a convergence of improving drill results, policy optimism, and geopolitical urgency. The abrupt reversal, however, serves as a reminder that rare earth investing remains highly sensitive to government decisions and competitive dynamics. While Tanbreez retains long-term strategic appeal, CRML now faces a more challenging environment where execution risk, funding access, and policy selection will determine whether the recent sell-off proves temporary—or a deeper reset in valuation.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR See More
Skerdian Meta
Lead Analyst
Skerdian Meta Lead Analyst. Skerdian is a professional Forex trader and a market analyst. He has been actively engaged in market analysis for the past 11 years. Before becoming our head analyst, Skerdian served as a trader and market analyst in Saxo Bank's local branch, Aksioner. Skerdian specialized in experimenting with developing models and hands-on trading. Skerdian has a masters degree in finance and investment.

Related Articles

HFM

Pu Prime

XM

Best Forex Brokers