ORCL Stock Heads to $120 as Massive $50 Billion AI Cost Clouds Oracle Valuation
Oracle’s early-2026 rebound has faded as investors refocus on legal risk, rising leverage, and the escalating cost of financing its...
Quick overview
- Oracle's stock has fallen approximately 4.5% as investors express concerns over a planned $45-$50 billion capital raise for AI data-center investments.
- The company's ambitious AI strategy faces scrutiny due to rising leverage, legal challenges, and deteriorating cash flow, raising doubts about its long-term sustainability.
- A recent bondholder lawsuit alleges Oracle misled investors regarding funding requirements for its AI expansion, further complicating market sentiment.
- Despite strong demand for AI cloud services, investor skepticism persists as Oracle struggles to demonstrate efficient monetization of its significant capital investments.
Live ORCL Chart
[[ORCL-graph]]
Oracle’s early-2026 rebound has faded as investors refocus on legal risk, rising leverage, and the escalating cost of financing its AI-driven cloud expansion.
Early-Year Momentum Gives Way to Renewed Skepticism
Oracle shares came under renewed pressure on Tuesday, falling roughly 4.5% as investors reacted to plans for another major capital raise tied to AI data-center investments. The move extended a broader downtrend that has been in place since early September 2025, when concerns over valuation, leverage, and execution first began to weigh on the stock.
The market’s response suggests that investors are becoming less willing to grant Oracle the benefit of the doubt. While demand for AI infrastructure remains strong, the financial burden required to support that growth is increasingly dominating the narrative.
A Massive Capital Raise Raises Red Flags
At the center of the latest selloff is Oracle’s plan to raise between $45 billion and $50 billion in gross proceeds during calendar year 2026. The funds are earmarked for a large-scale expansion of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), designed to meet contracted demand from major customers including AMD, Meta, Nvidia, OpenAI, TikTok, and xAI.
The company plans to split the financing roughly evenly between debt issuance and equity-linked instruments, alongside common stock sales. Goldman Sachs is set to lead the bond issuance, while Citigroup will oversee the equity component.
While management has framed the plan as a necessary investment to secure long-term growth, investors have been far less enthusiastic. The sheer scale of the raise has raised concerns about dilution, balance-sheet strain, and the sustainability of returns—particularly at a time when funding costs remain elevated.
Technical Signals Reflect Deteriorating Sentiment
From a technical perspective, Oracle’s price action reinforces the fundamental unease. On longer-term charts, the stock has slipped below the 20 moving average (gray) that previously acted as support, increasing the risk of deeper pullbacks. On shorter timeframes, rebounds have consistently failed near resistance levels, forming a clear pattern of lower highs.
ORCL Chart Monthly – Can the 20 SMA Is Under Attack
On the daily chart we saw a rebound off the 200 SMA (purple) in early January but the 50 SMA (yellow) rejected the price and now the 200 SMA has been broken. This structure suggests that sellers remain in control. A sustained break below current support levels would shift attention toward the $150 area which is under pressure now, with further downside risk extending toward the April lows near $118 if selling pressure accelerates.
ORCL Chart Daily – The Highs Keep Getting Lower
AI Demand Is Real, but So Are the Costs
There is little dispute that Oracle is seeing strong demand for AI-related cloud services. The company has positioned itself as a key infrastructure provider for some of the largest AI developers in the world, a strategy that has driven rapid revenue growth in its cloud segment.
However, the capital intensity of this strategy is now under sharper scrutiny. Building and operating AI-ready data centers requires massive upfront investment in hardware, power, and real estate, with payback periods that can stretch over many years.
For investors, the concern is not whether AI demand exists, but whether Oracle can monetize that demand efficiently enough to justify the financial risk it is taking on today.
Legal Challenges Add Another Layer of Uncertainty
Sentiment deteriorated further following news of a bondholder lawsuit filed in New York state court. The proposed class action, led by the Ohio Carpenters’ Pension Plan, alleges that Oracle misled investors about the funding requirements of its AI expansion.
The lawsuit focuses on Oracle’s issuance of roughly $18 billion in bonds in late September, shortly after the company announced a massive long-term agreement—reportedly worth up to $300 billion—to provide computing capacity to OpenAI. Plaintiffs argue that Oracle failed to adequately disclose the likelihood of additional borrowing needed to support such commitments.
While the legal outcome remains uncertain, the case has reignited concerns around disclosure and transparency. For a company that may need ongoing access to capital markets, even the perception of weakened trust can translate into higher financing costs.
Cash Flow Pressures Come Into Focus
Operationally, Oracle continues to post respectable top-line growth. Quarterly revenue increased 14% year over year, with cloud services and applications revenue rising more than 30%.
Yet beneath the surface, cash flow has become a growing point of tension. Free cash flow has deteriorated sharply, sinking deeper into negative territory beyond $13 billion as capital expenditures accelerate.
In the current market environment, this dynamic is particularly challenging. Investors are increasingly prioritizing free cash flow generation and balance-sheet discipline over growth at any cost. Without clearer visibility on when AI investments will begin to generate meaningful cash returns, skepticism is likely to persist.
Dividend Offers Stability—but Only Limited Support
Oracle’s dividend provides some downside support, particularly for income-focused investors. The company will pay a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share in January, equating to $2.00 annually and a forward payout ratio of just under 19%.
While the payout is well covered, the yield—around 1.05%—is modest relative to broader market alternatives. As such, the dividend alone is unlikely to offset concerns around dilution, rising debt, and long-term execution risk tied to the AI buildout.
Market Signals Point to Distribution, Not Accumulation
Technically, Oracle’s share price action has struggled to regain traction. Each recovery attempt over recent months has stalled quickly, forming a pattern that increasingly resembles distribution rather than renewed accumulation.
Institutional positioning reflects a similar mindset. Several asset managers have trimmed exposure, suggesting portfolio risk management rather than outright conviction in the current strategy.
Ambition Remains, but Proof Is Required
Oracle’s AI strategy is undeniably bold, and demand from marquee clients underscores its relevance in the evolving cloud landscape. However, the market is signaling that ambition alone is no longer enough.
Until investors gain confidence that Oracle can fund its AI expansion without excessive dilution, legal risk, or balance-sheet stress—and translate that spending into durable cash flow—the stock is likely to remain under pressure.
- Check out our free forex signals
- Follow the top economic events on FX Leaders economic calendar
- Trade better, discover more Forex Trading Strategies
- Open a FREE Trading Account
- Read our latest reviews on: Avatrade, Exness, HFM and XM
Save